The interest saved by a recast is a strange number to quote, because most of it is your own money coming back. If $50,000 saves $56,200 of interest over 27 years, $50,000 of that was the deposit — the genuine gain is the remaining $6,200, spread thin. What actually matters is whether that $50,000 could earn more somewhere else, and that is a comparison almost nobody runs before sending the wire.
A recast is a loan to yourself at your mortgage rate
Paying principal down earns you exactly your mortgage rate, risk-free and tax-free. At 6.5%, $50,000 of principal saves $3,250 of interest in the first year, guaranteed, because the alternative was paying that interest. There is no product on the market that offers a guaranteed 6.5%.
That is the strongest argument for recasting, and it is genuinely strong in a 6.5% rate environment. It stops being strong the moment the cash can earn something comparable, or the moment the rate is 3% and a savings account pays more than the mortgage costs.
Why this is not a simple interest-versus-interest comparison
The naive version compares the interest saved against the interest earned and stops. That is wrong in both directions. The recast produces a monthly cash flow, not a lump sum, so to compare fairly you have to reinvest those monthly savings and let them compound. And the cash alternative compounds as a single sum from day one, which is a big head start.
Run both correctly and a clean rule falls out: whichever rate is higher wins, once tax is accounted for. If the mortgage costs 6.5% and the cash earns 4.25% after tax, every dollar applied to the mortgage beats every dollar left in savings — that is the whole result, and no amount of compounding changes it.
The horizon problem
The comparison above runs to the end of the loan. That is a heroic assumption: most mortgages end early, through a sale or another refinance. If you sell in year five, the advantage you built by recasting arrives as extra equity at closing rather than as cash saved — real, but not spendable in the meantime.
This matters because the gap between the two routes grows over time. A five-year window tends to produce a modest difference either way; a twenty-seven-year window produces a large one. If you are unsure how long you will keep the loan, treat the long-run advantage as a tiebreaker rather than as the decision.
Tax, in both directions
Savings interest is taxed as ordinary income, so a 4.25% account is worth about 3.3% to someone in the 22% bracket. Mortgage interest is deductible only if you itemise, and for most borrowers the standard deduction is larger than the mortgage-interest deduction, which means the effective benefit is often zero.
Put the after-tax savings rate into the calculator and leave the mortgage rate alone unless you are certain you itemise. That combination is right for most people, and it tilts the comparison further towards the recast.
The thing the arithmetic cannot price
Cash in a savings account is available. Equity in a house is not, unless you sell or borrow against it — and borrowing against it later costs money and, in a falling market, may not be possible at all. Lenders froze home equity lines in 2008 and again in 2020.
So the honest framing is that recasting buys a guaranteed return at your mortgage rate and sells liquidity to get it. Whether that trade is good depends less on the rate spread than on whether the $50,000 is genuinely spare. If it is your emergency fund, the calculator is answering a question you should not be asking.
When each route wins
Recast wins when: the mortgage rate is materially above what cash earns after tax, you have years left on the loan, the lump sum is genuinely spare, and you want the lower required payment as well as the return.
Keeping cash wins when: the mortgage rate is low — a 3% loan against a 4.5% savings rate is a losing trade for the recast — or when the cash is your buffer, or when you expect rates on cash to rise and want to stay flexible.
Neither wins decisively when: the two rates are within half a point of each other. At that point, decide on liquidity and on whether you want the lower monthly payment, because the money is a coin flip.
What this cannot tell you
It cannot tell you whether your servicer offers recasts, what their minimum is, or whether they will decline you. It assumes a fixed rate and a fixed return, neither of which is guaranteed over 27 years. And it ignores the moment most decisions actually get made — when life changes and the plan does not survive contact with it.
Used properly, it does one thing well: it stops the recast from being justified by the big interest-saved number, which is mostly your own deposit returning home.
Frequently asked questions
The questions this comparison usually raises.